Turkish Journal of Surgery - 2008; 24(3)
http://www.ulusalcerrahidergisi.org
Turkish Journal of Surgery - RSS feed of 2008; 24(3)1300-0705September 2008Turkish Journal of Surgery1300-0705
http://www.ulusalcerrahidergisi.org/text.php3?id=717
2008-09-01Turkish Journal of Surgery3241302008-09-01125Original Article
http://www.ulusalcerrahidergisi.org/text.php3?id=724
th , 14 th , 21 st , 28 th and
35 th days postoperatively and extension and severity of the adhesion
and tissue reaction to the implants are evaluated. Results: At the end of the
study, no difference was found between two groups concerning extension and
severity of the adhesion. Adhesion were more frequent in the rats sacrificed on
the 7 th and 14 th days. Proceed mesh adhesion extension
(U=376, p<0.05) and severity (U=352, p<0.05)) were significantly less than
HI-TEX mesh. Tissue reactions to implants were more with HI-TEX mesh, however,
no difference was found statistically significant (x2=0.41, p>0.05).
Conclusion: We have the opinion that Proceed mesh is superior to HI-TEX mesh in
hernia repair as it has less adhesion formation effect. As a result, Proceed
mesh is thought to be a more suitable hernia repairment material compared to
HI-TEX mesh.]]>2008-09-01Turkish Journal of Surgery3241362008-09-01131Original Article
http://www.ulusalcerrahidergisi.org/text.php3?id=725
2008-09-01Turkish Journal of Surgery3241442008-09-01137Original Article
http://www.ulusalcerrahidergisi.org/text.php3?id=726
2008-09-01Turkish Journal of Surgery3241492008-09-01145Original Article
http://www.ulusalcerrahidergisi.org/text.php3?id=727
2008-09-01Turkish Journal of Surgery3241552008-09-01150Original Article
http://www.ulusalcerrahidergisi.org/text.php3?id=728
2008-09-01Turkish Journal of Surgery3241592008-09-01156Original Article
http://www.ulusalcerrahidergisi.org/text.php3?id=729
2008-09-01Turkish Journal of Surgery3241632008-09-01160Review
http://www.ulusalcerrahidergisi.org/text.php3?id=730
2008-09-01Turkish Journal of Surgery3241652008-09-01164Letter to Editor